Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping

From: Matthew Kim <matthewkmkim(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping
Date: 2024-08-08 22:16:37
Message-ID: CAGzNdfF-nbL=-2vP=pCynn0-2kwTt3wW96dctdJYveeOWrvY1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've updated patch 0004 to check the return value of pg_mul_s32_overflow().
Since tm.tm_year overflowed, the error message is hardcoded.

Thanks,
Matthew Kim

Attachment Content-Type Size
v18-0002-Remove-dependence-on-integer-wrapping-for-jsonb.patch application/x-patch 2.7 KB
v18-0001-Remove-dependence-on-integer-wrapping.patch application/x-patch 14.4 KB
v18-0003-Handle-overflows-in-do_to_timestamp.patch application/x-patch 3.1 KB
v18-0004-Handle-overflow-when-taking-absolute-value-of-BC-yea.patch application/x-patch 1.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2024-08-08 22:18:38 Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-08-08 21:29:12 Re: PATCH: Add hooks for pg_total_relation_size and pg_indexes_size