Re: Replica on low-bandwitdh network

From: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Job <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replica on low-bandwitdh network
Date: 2017-12-05 15:27:29
Message-ID: CAGrpgQ-795NNDdhVT9Bjc0=Sq=8Q6NLkzFY-jt8sb2GYUu9wPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Job <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it> wrote:

> we have some postgreswl 9.6.1 servers in two different continent.
> Latency is from 180 to 250 ms between the two sites.
>
> Actually we use Rubyrep for off-site replication, since servers are
> completely independent in case of connectivity loss.
>
> We are experiencing some problems with lock tables (rubyrep works with
> trigger to commit changes to the other server),
> we think for the uncommon latency.
>

​You might get more mileage from pglogical (
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/) which you can use to
ship just the changes, though given my unfamiliarity with Rubyrep maybe
that's what it does too (?)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eugene Poole 2017-12-05 18:59:26 Migrating From CentOS-6 Oracle 11g R2 To CentOS-7 PostgreSQL ??
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2017-12-05 14:03:59 Re: [GENERAL] Schema Information .