Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints

From: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
Date: 2021-03-10 05:38:06
Message-ID: CAGRY4nzwU4LKwCUp-TFYFGB178hY-H3GkwDCCQNKSepghth7fw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 20:50, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> On 1/22/21 6:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> This patch set no longer applies:
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2927.log.
>
> Can we get a rebase? Also marked Waiting on Author.
>

Rebased as requested.

I'm still interested in whether Andres will be able to do anything about
identifying LWLocks in a cross-backend manner. But this work doesn't really
depend on that; it'd benefit from it, but would be easily adapted to it
later if needed.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Pass-the-target-LWLock-and-tranche-ID-to-LWLock-trac.patch text/x-patch 7.2 KB
0004-SDT-tracepoints-for-backend-type-and-postmaster-pid-.patch text/x-patch 3.2 KB
0003-Comments-on-LWLock-tranches.patch text/x-patch 5.5 KB
0002-Add-to-the-tracepoints-in-LWLock-routines.patch text/x-patch 5.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-03-10 05:55:05 pgsql: Move tablespace path re-creation from the makefiles to pg_regres
Previous Message Peter Smith 2021-03-10 05:37:19 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions