Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints

On 1/22/21 6:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2021-01-14 09:39, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 15:56, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
>> <mailto:peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 2020-12-19 06:00, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>      > Patch 1 fixes a bogus tracepoint where an lwlock__acquire event
>>     would be
>>      > fired from LWLockWaitForVar, despite that function never actually
>>      > acquiring the lock.
>>
>>     This was added in 68a2e52bbaf when LWLockWaitForVar() was first
>>     introduced.  It looks like a mistake to me too, but maybe Heikki
>> wants
>>     to comment.
>>
>>
>> I'm certain it's a copy/paste bug.
>
> I have committed that patch.

This patch set no longer applies:
http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2927.log.

Can we get a rebase? Also marked Waiting on Author.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net