From: | Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Runtime control of CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS |
Date: | 2021-01-05 23:30:37 |
Message-ID: | CAGRY4nyFzr6RF5hbyRq9JeN2kXd7Z4yU3sMyrRqCwG2DjWDuEw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, 22:41 Peter Eisentraut, <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2020-12-03 07:01, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > To try it out, apply the patch (git am), build with --enable-cassert,
> > then compare:
> >
> > make -C src/test/regress check
> >
> > and
> >
> > PGOPTIONS="-c debug_clobber_cache_depth=1" \
> > make -C src/test/regress check
> >
> > The speed difference will be obvious if nothing else!
>
> This is a really useful feature change. I have a version that I'm happy
> to commit, but I wanted to check on the name of the setting. The
> proposed name arose during the discussion when it was just to set the
> recursion depth but not enable the feature altogether, so I think that
> name is a bit misleading now. We could reuse the old macro name, as in
> clobber_cache_always=N, which is very recognizable. But the feature
> itself doesn't clobber anything (that's done by CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY),
> so most accurate would be something like
> invalidate_system_caches_always=N. Thoughts?
>
Modulo typo, I think that's a better name.
Perhaps debug_invalidate_system_caches_always ? It's a bit long but we use
the debug prefix elsewhere too.
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> 2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
> https://www.2ndquadrant.com/
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-01-05 23:46:01 | Re: allow to \dtS+ pg_toast.* |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-01-05 23:23:34 | Re: Replication protocol pipelining edge case |