From: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid GatherMerge crash when there are no workers. |
Date: | 2017-04-03 07:26:36 |
Message-ID: | CAGPqQf3C+3PBujb+7m=ceWeii4-vBY=XS99LjzrpkpefvzJbFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 2017-04-01 01:22:14 +0000, Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> Avoid GatherMerge crash when there are no workers.
>> >
>> > I think the gather merge code needs a bit more test coverage (sorry to
>> > make this a larger theme today). As shown by
>> > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/executor/nodeGat
>> herMerge.c.gcov.html
>> > we don't actually merge anything (heap_compare_slots is not exercised).
>>
>> Sounds reasonable.
>>
>
> I am working on this and will submit the patch soon.
>
>
On my local environment I was getting coverage for the heap_compare_slots
with
existing test. But it seems like due to low number of record fetch only
leader get
evolved to the fetching tuples in the shared report.
I modified the current test coverage for the Gather Merge to add more rows
to be
fetch by the GatherMerge node to make sure that it do coverage for
heap_compare_slots. Also added test for the zero worker.
PFA patch as well as LCOV report for the nodeGatherMerge.c.
>> > I btw also wonder if it's good that we have a nearly identical copy of
>> > heap_compare_slots and a bunch of the calling code in both
>> > nodeMergeAppend.c and nodeGatherMerge.c. On the other hand, it's not
>> > heavily envolving code.
>>
>> Yeah, I don't know. We could alternatively try to move that to some
>> common location and merge the two implementations. I'm not sure
>> exactly where, though.
>>
>> --
>> Robert Haas
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rushabh Lathia
>
--
Rushabh Lathia
www.EnterpriseDB.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
nodeGatherMerge.c.gcov.html | text/html | 65.2 KB |
gather_merge_test_coverage.patch | text/x-patch | 3.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-03 14:52:05 | pgsql: doc: Change xref style to number only |
Previous Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2017-04-03 05:26:16 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid GatherMerge crash when there are no workers. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-04-03 07:27:15 | Re: Logical decoding on standby |
Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2017-04-03 07:17:44 | Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |