From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres and --config-file option |
Date: | 2024-05-15 14:47:27 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQTSOU9TNEZZ5S_78KAEbGCkWVndeNkyGX=DJeY2P7ru8w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 11:49, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> Yeah, some of this is becoming quite unwieldy, if we document and
> mention each spelling variant of each option everywhere.
>
> Maybe if the original problem is that the option --config-file is not
> explicitly in the --help output, let's add it to the --help output?
I definitely think it would be useful to list this --config variant in
more places, imho it's nicer than the -c variant. Especially in the
PGOPTIONS docs it would be useful. People are already using it in the
wild and I regressed on support for that in PgBouncer by accident:
https://github.com/pgbouncer/pgbouncer/pull/1064
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Luzanov | 2024-05-15 15:05:31 | Re: Things I don't like about \du's "Attributes" column |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-15 14:30:56 | Re: Fixup a few 2023 copyright years |