Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements
Date: 2025-03-07 17:52:38
Message-ID: CAGECzQQ3drHK=wpC27rNp2Sh0B7+DDmNmA3xU0uMPfZvL7u5HQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 17:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm, don't you *want* a failure if the patch is already applied?

It's pretty common that in a larger patchset the first 1-2
small/trivial patches get committed before the rest. Having to then
send an additional email, resubmitting the rest of the patchset
because CFBot fails when re-applying those is kind of silly. This
avoids that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-03-07 17:54:43 Re: pg_atomic_compare_exchange_*() and memory barriers
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-03-07 17:46:58 Re: pg_atomic_compare_exchange_*() and memory barriers