| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements |
| Date: | 2025-03-07 17:57:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1058908.1741370245@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> writes:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 17:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hm, don't you *want* a failure if the patch is already applied?
> It's pretty common that in a larger patchset the first 1-2
> small/trivial patches get committed before the rest. Having to then
> send an additional email, resubmitting the rest of the patchset
> because CFBot fails when re-applying those is kind of silly. This
> avoids that.
Got it. That is indeed an improvement, though of course it only
helps if those patches were applied verbatim.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Navneet Kumar | 2025-03-07 18:09:34 | Re: support virtual generated column not null constraint |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-03-07 17:54:43 | Re: pg_atomic_compare_exchange_*() and memory barriers |