Re: Weird procedure question

From: James Keener <jim(at)jimkeener(dot)com>
To: lists(at)alteeve(dot)ca
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Weird procedure question
Date: 2018-09-25 05:33:10
Message-ID: CAG8g3tzyWi_Je1TBohK=x=_MUd391BCsBOo=W48mxdvUbw=DyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Do you need a single field for the pk or can you just make it the
(original_table_pk, modified_time)? Alternatively, you could generate a
uuid v3 from the (original_table_pk, modified_time) using something like
uuid_generate_v3(uuid_nil(), original_table_pk || ":" || modified_time)?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message digimer 2018-09-25 05:38:44 Re: Weird procedure question
Previous Message digimer 2018-09-25 05:28:34 Re: Weird procedure question