From: | Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dave(dot)page(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?) |
Date: | 2014-02-26 04:27:51 |
Message-ID: | CAG7mmozuvuUiZoQ4q=dD2CaLj+M_p6gjHTe9O1vWTv6jPdNRng@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Done.
Checked-in in the master and REL-1_18_0_PATCHES branch.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
>> Just wondering - is anything happening with this patch?
>>
> I was waiting for other hackers for their response.
> I will check-in the patch as nobody objected.
>
> Thanks for the reminder though.
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ian Barwick
>>
>> 2014-02-05 19:02 GMT+09:00 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>> Thanks for the update .
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Ian Barwick
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-05 Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
>>>
>>> Dave,
>>>>
>>>> The patch, sent by Ian Lawrence, looks good me.
>>>> I also found some other places, where the similar changes were required
>>>> (specially in debugger code).
>>>> I've attached the combined patch (debugger changes and Ian's patch).
>>>>
>>>> If nobody has any objection, I will check-in the patch on both
>>>> REL-1_18_0_PATCHES and master branch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick <
>>>> barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 2014/1/10 Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry - it was missed due to busy schedule.
>>>>>> I will take a look at it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No worries, thanks for replying so quickly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian Barwick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick <
>>>>>> barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>>>>>> > 2013/11/22 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> BTW other objects (tables, schemas etc.) with OIDs greater than
>>>>>>> 256^4/2 - 1
>>>>>>> >>> don't seem to be affected by this.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> It's been a while since I've looked at the pgAdmin source, but
>>>>>>> some wild
>>>>>>> >> grepping shows that in:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> pgadmin/schema/pgRole.cpp
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> the role OID is set with:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> role->iSetOid(roles->GetLong(wxT("oid")));
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> whereas almost everywhere else it's set with GetOid(), e.g.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> table->iSetOid(tables->GetOid(wxT("oid")));
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> which may or may not have something to do with the issue.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > If that is the problem, then here's a patch. Untested as I don't
>>>>>>> have a Windows
>>>>>>> > build environment available, though I might be able to cobble one
>>>>>>> together
>>>>>>> > next week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just wondering - has anyone been able to look into this?
>>>>>>> Unfortunately I still
>>>>>>> don't have a Windows build environment available to test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ian Barwick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (
>>>>>>> pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ashesh Vashi
>>>> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> --
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Ashesh Vashi
> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>
>
>
> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>
--
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2014-02-26 05:20:54 | Re: Bug report: OIDs, roles and Windows (signedness issue?) |
Previous Message | Ashesh Vashi | 2014-02-26 04:26:56 | pgAdmin III commit: Using GetOid() function for oid columns in role and |