Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?

From: Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Graeme B(dot) Bell" <graeme(dot)bell(at)nibio(dot)no>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?
Date: 2015-07-08 18:08:56
Message-ID: CAFwQ8rfA1k-1zPz+PR=ssdShLRNiVG9Br7h3K0SYQPjV-NtBGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:

>
> On 07/08/2015 10:48 AM, Craig James wrote:
>
> I admit that I haven't read this whole thread but:
>>
>> Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each
>> instance of the function being executed and that in turn will use
>> all CPUs up to the max available resource.
>>
>> With PostgreSQL, that isn't going to happen unless you are running
>> (at least) 8 functions across 8 connections.
>>
>>
>> Well, right, which is why I mentioned "even with dozens of clients."
>> Shouldn't that scale to at least all of the CPUs in use if the function
>> is CPU intensive (which it is)?
>>
>
> In theory but that isn't PostgreSQL that does that, it will be the kernel
> scheduler. Although (and I am grasping at straws):
>
> I wonder if the execution is taking place outside of the backend proper
> or... are you using a pooler?
>

No pooler, and the functions were in an ordinary SQL extension .so library
and loaded as

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION funcname( ... ) returns ...
AS 'libxxx.so', 'funcname LANGUAGE c STRICT IMMUTABLE COST 10000;

Craig

> JD
>
>
>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> JD
>>
>> --
>> Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
>> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
>> Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
>> control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---------------------------------
>> Craig A. James
>> Chief Technology Officer
>> eMolecules, Inc.
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
> Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
> control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
>

--
---------------------------------
Craig A. James
Chief Technology Officer
eMolecules, Inc.
---------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2015-07-08 18:46:53 Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-07-08 17:52:08 Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?