Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this?

On 07/08/2015 10:48 AM, Craig James wrote:

> I admit that I haven't read this whole thread but:
>
> Using Apache Fast-CGI, you are going to fork a process for each
> instance of the function being executed and that in turn will use
> all CPUs up to the max available resource.
>
> With PostgreSQL, that isn't going to happen unless you are running
> (at least) 8 functions across 8 connections.
>
>
> Well, right, which is why I mentioned "even with dozens of clients."
> Shouldn't that scale to at least all of the CPUs in use if the function
> is CPU intensive (which it is)?

In theory but that isn't PostgreSQL that does that, it will be the
kernel scheduler. Although (and I am grasping at straws):

I wonder if the execution is taking place outside of the backend proper
or... are you using a pooler?

JD

>
> Craig
>
>
>
>
> JD
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
> Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
> control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
>
>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------
> Craig A. James
> Chief Technology Officer
> eMolecules, Inc.
> ---------------------------------

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.