From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Assignment of valid collation for SET operations on queries with UNKNOWN types. |
Date: | 2017-01-25 11:12:05 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRfqi47vCdo7EUw6Fw8uTh2O5EwM37QEMnzSZ+ErTprw_g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> The table of Pseudo-Types needs to be updated as well with unknown in
>>>> datatype.sgml.
>>
>>> Check.
>>
>> Here's an updated patch with doc changes. Aside from that one,
>> I tried to spell "pseudo-type" consistently, and I changed one
>> place where we were calling something a pseudo-type that isn't.
I think, those changes, even though small, deserve their own commit.
The changes themselves look good.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2017-01-25 11:24:18 | Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types |
Previous Message | Shailesh Singh | 2017-01-25 11:03:14 | Fwd: I could not see any row in audit table |