From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert |
Date: | 2018-06-26 13:32:55 |
Message-ID: | CAFjFpRewd8RN7OxZFn5C1v_zLNJEYjeQY+6OfX2g4F+vPuXJug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Looks like we need similar adjustment in ExecSimpleRelationUpdate() as
>> well. Updated the patch.
>>
>
> - /* Store the slot into tuple that we can write. */
> + /* Materialize slot into a tuple that we can inspect. */
> tuple = ExecMaterializeSlot(slot);
>
> I think it is better to keep the last word of the sentence as "write"
> instead of "inspect" as was in the original sentence.
A copy-pasto while correcting a typo :)
> It makes more
> sense as we are materializing the tuple to write it. Similarly, in
> the other change in the patch can use "write".
Are you suggesting that we should use "write" in the modified comment
instead of "inspect" in original comment.
Ok, I have now corrected grammar as well. Here's updated patch.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0002-Fix-a-thinko-typo-in-ExecSimpleRelationInsert-Update.patch | text/x-patch | 1.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry Jelinek | 2018-06-26 13:35:57 | patch to allow disable of WAL recycling |
Previous Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2018-06-26 13:21:17 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |