From: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Date: | 2018-06-26 13:21:17 |
Message-ID: | 3526971530019277@web36j.yandex.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
I tried build this patch and got error during make docs
> postgres.sgml:19626: element xref: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "runtime-checksumhelper-cost-limit"
> postgres.sgml:19625: element xref: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "runtime-checksumhelper-cost-delay"
Both new GUC checksumhelper_cost_delay and checksumhelper_cost_limit mentioned in postgresql.conf with special value -1 (-1 to use vacuum_cost_limit), but this value was not mentioned in docs. I noticed that the code and documentation describe different defaults.
Also i found one "<literal>in progress</literal>" in pg_enable_data_checksums() description. In other places status is called "inprogress" (without space).
> VacuumPageHit = 0;
> VacuumPageMiss = 0;
> VacuumPageDirty = 0;
Hm, why these settings are set to 0 in checksumhelper process?
> /*
> * Force a checkpoint to get everything out to disk. XXX: this should
> * probably not be an IMMEDIATE checkpoint, but leave it there for now for
> * testing
> */
> RequestCheckpoint(CHECKPOINT_FORCE | CHECKPOINT_WAIT | CHECKPOINT_IMMEDIATE);
We need not forget that.
regards, Sergei
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-06-26 13:32:55 | Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-06-26 13:16:16 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |