From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow |
Date: | 2014-03-18 19:36:49 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDmFrQ_hLRTXJvYd_StsQNwjMBg_sOORATnCxj+R9vo5A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
Tomorrow I'll do a review
fast check
<para>
+ To aid the user in finding instances of simple but common problems
before
+ they cause harm, <application>PL/PgSQL</> provides a number of
additional
+ <replaceable>checks</>. When enabled, depending on the configuration,
they
+ can be used to emit either a <literal>WARNING</> or an
<literal>ERROR</>
+ during the compilation of a function.
+ </para>
>>>provides a number of additional<<<
There will be only one check in 9.4, so this sentence is confusing and
should be reformulated.
Regards
Pavel
2014-03-18 20:29 GMT+01:00 Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>
> On 18/03/14 20:15, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2014-03-18 20:14 GMT+01:00 Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>
>> On 18 March 2014 19:04, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think so only "shadow" is good name for some check. Maybe
>> > "shadow-variables-check"
>>
>> "shadowed-variables" would be a better name.
>>
>
> +1
>
>
> Attached V4 uses "shadowed-variables" instead of "shadow".
>
> --
> Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-03-18 19:38:07 | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-18 19:35:42 | Re: Wiki Page Draft for upcoming release |