| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow |
| Date: | 2014-03-18 19:44:05 |
| Message-ID: | 5328A205.2070303@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/03/14 20:36, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> <para>
> + To aid the user in finding instances of simple but common
> problems before
> + they cause harm, <application>PL/PgSQL</> provides a number of
> additional
> + <replaceable>checks</>. When enabled, depending on the
> configuration, they
> + can be used to emit either a <literal>WARNING</> or an
> <literal>ERROR</>
> + during the compilation of a function.
> + </para>
>
> >>>provides a number of additional<<<
>
> There will be only one check in 9.4, so this sentence is confusing and
> should be reformulated.
Thanks, yeah I left that sentence unchanged from original patch, maybe I
should remove the word "number" there as it implies that there are a lot
of them, but I don't really want to change everything to singular when
the input is specified as list.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-03-18 19:45:53 | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-18 19:38:42 | Re: Patch: show relation and tuple infos of a lock to acquire |