Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
Date: 2013-08-29 22:04:59
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDXZvi4EYrOG9djQ9GdxNwDtBSjgn7SWDMRCRm9851j9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2013/8/29 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>

> On 2013-08-29 23:54:28 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > No think so PERFORM is a significant problem. A mayor problem for
> > > beginners is usually a fact, so PL/pgSQL is ALGOL like languages - and
> they
> > > don't know with these languages. Second problem is missing a more
> dynamic
> > > data structures. Next a really different syntax and usage of OUT
> variables,
> > > ...
> > >
> >
> > look to stackoverflow for often questions - the big issue is
> impossibility
> > to iterate over record -- and return really dynamic result - pivot
> tables.
>
> So what? That's completely orthogonal to the discussion at hand. We're
> discussion about specific change, that there are other features people
> badly want shouldn't be stopping this.
>

I am sorry, this is too offtopic.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
> --
> Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ants Aasma 2013-08-29 22:10:40 Re: Master-slave visibility order
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-08-29 22:04:43 Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE