| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
| Date: | 2013-08-29 21:59:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20130829215912.GB4283@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-08-29 23:54:28 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > No think so PERFORM is a significant problem. A mayor problem for
> > beginners is usually a fact, so PL/pgSQL is ALGOL like languages - and they
> > don't know with these languages. Second problem is missing a more dynamic
> > data structures. Next a really different syntax and usage of OUT variables,
> > ...
> >
>
> look to stackoverflow for often questions - the big issue is impossibility
> to iterate over record -- and return really dynamic result - pivot tables.
So what? That's completely orthogonal to the discussion at hand. We're
discussion about specific change, that there are other features people
badly want shouldn't be stopping this.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-08-29 21:59:25 | Re: Master-slave visibility order |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-08-29 21:54:28 | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |