Re: Postgresql equal join on function with columns not use index

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan(at)cisco(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql equal join on function with columns not use index
Date: 2023-06-13 14:17:59
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDE6B7BENcy1sxfNJ9F0jrB+g-OfdpT9eFT13RFxxDecA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

út 13. 6. 2023 v 15:50 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:

> "James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan(at)cisco(dot)com> writes:
> > Looks like it's the function "regexp_replace" volatile and
> restrict=false make the difference, we have our application role with
> default search_path=oracle,$user,public,pg_catalog.
> > =# select
> oid,proname,pronamespace::regnamespace,prosecdef,proisstrict,provolatile
> from pg_proc where proname='regexp_replace' order by oid;
> > oid | proname | pronamespace | prosecdef | proisstrict |
> provolatile
> >
> -------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+-------------
> > 2284 | regexp_replace | pg_catalog | f | t | i
> > 2285 | regexp_replace | pg_catalog | f | t | i
> > 17095 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
> > 17096 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
> > 17097 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
> > 17098 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
>
> Why in the world are the oracle ones marked volatile? That's what's
> preventing them from being used in index quals.
>

It looks like orafce issue

I'll fix it

Regards

Pavel

>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2023-06-13 15:00:57 Re: Postgresql equal join on function with columns not use index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-06-13 13:50:48 Re: Postgresql equal join on function with columns not use index