From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan(at)cisco(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql equal join on function with columns not use index |
Date: | 2023-06-13 15:00:57 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDAsVqPJbG4qTEEVUsksQYCG6K_xZZsM1UouTwA8dBsww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
út 13. 6. 2023 v 16:17 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:
>
>
> út 13. 6. 2023 v 15:50 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
>
>> "James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan(at)cisco(dot)com> writes:
>> > Looks like it's the function "regexp_replace" volatile and
>> restrict=false make the difference, we have our application role with
>> default search_path=oracle,$user,public,pg_catalog.
>> > =# select
>> oid,proname,pronamespace::regnamespace,prosecdef,proisstrict,provolatile
>> from pg_proc where proname='regexp_replace' order by oid;
>> > oid | proname | pronamespace | prosecdef | proisstrict |
>> provolatile
>> >
>> -------+----------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+-------------
>> > 2284 | regexp_replace | pg_catalog | f | t | i
>> > 2285 | regexp_replace | pg_catalog | f | t | i
>> > 17095 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
>> > 17096 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
>> > 17097 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
>> > 17098 | regexp_replace | oracle | f | f | v
>>
>> Why in the world are the oracle ones marked volatile? That's what's
>> preventing them from being used in index quals.
>>
>
> It looks like orafce issue
>
> I'll fix it
>
should be fixed in orafce 4.4.
Regards
Pavel
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Patrick O'Toole | 2023-06-13 19:24:51 | Helping planner to chose sequential scan when it improves performance |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2023-06-13 14:17:59 | Re: Postgresql equal join on function with columns not use index |