Re: [RFC] Add jit deform_counter

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add jit deform_counter
Date: 2022-12-25 17:55:02
Message-ID: CAFj8pRD59kJhPAB4w0nfK4w3i6OZnnNwZoht6Mm+=z0DKe_FNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

ne 11. 12. 2022 v 5:44 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

> Hi
>
> ne 11. 12. 2022 v 1:14 odesílatel Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
> napsal:
>
>> 2022年6月12日(日) 18:14 Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've noticed that JIT performance counter generation_counter seems to
>> include
>> > actions, relevant for both jit_expressions and jit_tuple_deforming
>> options. It
>> > means one can't directly see what is the influence of
>> jit_tuple_deforming
>> > alone, which would be helpful when adjusting JIT options. To make it
>> better a
>> > new counter can be introduced, does it make sense?
>>
>> Hi Pavel
>>
>> I see you are added as reviewer in the CF app; have you been able to take
>> a look
>> at this?
>>
>
> I hope so yes
>

there are some problems with stability of regress tests

http://cfbot.cputube.org/dmitry-dolgov.html

Regards

Pavel

> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ian Barwick
>>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-12-25 18:24:08 Re: [PATCH] Improve ability to display optimizer analysis using OPTIMIZER_DEBUG
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-25 17:13:26 Re: Error-safe user functions