From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] Add jit deform_counter |
Date: | 2022-12-11 04:44:54 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA0SAS-YFayZdf8cM3wOnEXamCPrxS3mVa+U3oG=0h2uw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
ne 11. 12. 2022 v 1:14 odesílatel Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:
> 2022年6月12日(日) 18:14 Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've noticed that JIT performance counter generation_counter seems to
> include
> > actions, relevant for both jit_expressions and jit_tuple_deforming
> options. It
> > means one can't directly see what is the influence of jit_tuple_deforming
> > alone, which would be helpful when adjusting JIT options. To make it
> better a
> > new counter can be introduced, does it make sense?
>
> Hi Pavel
>
> I see you are added as reviewer in the CF app; have you been able to take
> a look
> at this?
>
I hope so yes
Regards
Pavel
>
> Regards
>
> Ian Barwick
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2022-12-11 05:29:15 | Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks? |
Previous Message | Anton A. Melnikov | 2022-12-11 03:50:49 | Re: [BUG] Logical replica crash if there was an error in a function. |