| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |
| Date: | 2015-03-30 19:58:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRD1f4Eby6X-ruxEM0uCRHCemEzm2Ec6zXZqsqQCbtL=XA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-03-30 21:30 GMT+02:00 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > 2015-03-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> > > In the public docs, you should s/position/subscript because that's the
> > > term used throughout the docs for an index into an array. I still like
> > > the name array_position() for the function though, because it's
> > > consistent with the existing position() functions.
> >
> > updated patch
>
> Thanks, pushed.
>
>
Thank you very much
Pavel
> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-03-30 20:39:34 | Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-03-30 19:50:09 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Centralize definition of integer limits. |