Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position
Date: 2015-03-30 19:30:17
Message-ID: 20150330193017.GB3071@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2015-03-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> > In the public docs, you should s/position/subscript because that's the
> > term used throughout the docs for an index into an array. I still like
> > the name array_position() for the function though, because it's
> > consistent with the existing position() functions.
>
> updated patch

Thanks, pushed.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-03-30 19:38:16 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Centralize definition of integer limits.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-30 19:05:38 Re: Error with index on unlogged table