From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |
Date: | 2015-03-30 19:30:17 |
Message-ID: | 20150330193017.GB3071@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2015-03-22 11:30 GMT+01:00 Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > In the public docs, you should s/position/subscript because that's the
> > term used throughout the docs for an index into an array. I still like
> > the name array_position() for the function though, because it's
> > consistent with the existing position() functions.
>
> updated patch
Thanks, pushed.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-30 19:38:16 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Centralize definition of integer limits. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-30 19:05:38 | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |