| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: JSON output functions. |
| Date: | 2012-02-02 17:20:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRD-hRwdFJmB7LQbVgZf3hg6GnWW5aGwZ_rupqSs97z_XA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/2/2 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
>
> On 02/02/2012 04:35 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>>
>> At 2012-02-01 18:48:28 -0500, andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com wrote:
>>>
>>> For now I'm inclined not to proceed with that, and leave it as an
>>> optimization to be considered later if necessary. Thoughts?
>>
>> I agree, there doesn't seem to be a pressing need to do it now.
>>
>
>
> OK, here's my final version of the patch for constructor functions. If
> there's no further comment I'll go with this.
These function are super, Thank you
Do you plan to fix a issue with row attribute names in 9.2?
Regards
Pavel
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-02 17:45:40 | Re: heap_tuple_needs_freeze false positive |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-02 17:18:26 | Re: spgist text_ops and LIKE |