| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: JSON output functions. |
| Date: | 2012-02-02 15:15:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4F2AA895.7030300@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/02/2012 04:35 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2012-02-01 18:48:28 -0500, andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com wrote:
>> For now I'm inclined not to proceed with that, and leave it as an
>> optimization to be considered later if necessary. Thoughts?
> I agree, there doesn't seem to be a pressing need to do it now.
>
OK, here's my final version of the patch for constructor functions. If
there's no further comment I'll go with this.
cheers
andrew
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| json-constructors.patch | text/x-patch | 21.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-02 15:19:47 | Re: double writes using "double-write buffer" approach [WIP] |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-02-02 15:10:12 | Re: keywords in initdb are case-sensitive? |