Re: broken formatting?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: broken formatting?
Date: 2023-02-25 17:14:13
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCo_OYS8-9T=Kf6qB5ToHZ5mcT+w9guo4aDjY6sLR5FQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

so 25. 2. 2023 v 18:13 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:

> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > so 25. 2. 2023 v 17:57 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> >> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >>> -numeric (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> >>> +numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
>
> >> Sadly, pgindent will just put that back, because it knows that "numeric"
> >> is a typedef.
>
> > Is it possible to rename this function?
>
> That would be a way out, but it never seemed worth the trouble.
>

ook

Regards

Pavel

>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-25 18:29:33 Re: windows/meson cfbot warnings
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-02-25 17:13:54 locale/encoding vs vcregress.pl installcheck