Re: broken formatting?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: broken formatting?
Date: 2023-02-25 17:13:13
Message-ID: 1181733.1677345193@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> so 25. 2. 2023 v 17:57 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> -numeric (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
>>> +numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)

>> Sadly, pgindent will just put that back, because it knows that "numeric"
>> is a typedef.

> Is it possible to rename this function?

That would be a way out, but it never seemed worth the trouble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-02-25 17:13:54 locale/encoding vs vcregress.pl installcheck
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-25 17:06:56 Re: how does postgresql handle LOB/CLOB/BLOB column data that dies before the query ends