Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Anderson <neil(at)postgrescompare(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams
Date: 2017-06-15 03:08:42
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCTDQ4ZgNgcr+E==xpLuHCvpRsHxqywiiyUzu5jQQTjUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-06-15 5:06 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:

> On 2017-06-14 20:02:27 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On June 14, 2017 7:53:05 PM PDT, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > >2017-06-14 19:49 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
> > >> > These constraints can slowdown creating/dropping database objects -
> > >> mainly
> > >> > temp tables.
> > >>
> > >> How so?
> > >>
> > >
> > >execution RI triggers
> >
> > Those would obviously bit be fired, given Peter's description?
>
> Gah, stupid autocorrect. *not* be fired. Unless you mean something
> else than the speed of catalog manipulations themselves, in which case I
> still don't understand.
>

No, just this. I missed it.

Regards

Pavel

>
> - Andres
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2017-06-15 03:09:48 Re: improve release-note for pg_current_logfile()
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-06-15 03:06:37 Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams