| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Anderson <neil(at)postgrescompare(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams |
| Date: | 2017-06-15 03:06:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20170615030637.vzjedp43v6jrydpy@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-06-14 20:02:27 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On June 14, 2017 7:53:05 PM PDT, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >2017-06-14 19:49 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
> >> > These constraints can slowdown creating/dropping database objects -
> >> mainly
> >> > temp tables.
> >>
> >> How so?
> >>
> >
> >execution RI triggers
>
> Those would obviously bit be fired, given Peter's description?
Gah, stupid autocorrect. *not* be fired. Unless you mean something
else than the speed of catalog manipulations themselves, in which case I
still don't understand.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-06-15 03:08:42 | Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-06-15 03:04:32 | Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams |