Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Date: 2015-12-17 19:58:13
Message-ID: CAFj8pRCHMj2NdwaG+uJzSbi9NV=+eQw5_ZxaYzoZr+Qm=U-AdA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-12-14 23:15 GMT+01:00 Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>:

> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> > here is patch - supported syntax: \crosstabview VCol [+/-]HCol
> [HOrderCol]
> >
> > Order column should to contains any numeric value. Values are sorted on
> > client side
>
> If I understand correctly, I see a problem with HOrderCol.
>
> If the vertical header consists of, for example, a series of
> event names, and it should be sorted by event date, then
> the requirement of HOrderCol being strictly numeric is
> problematic, in a way that the previous proposal was not, isn't it?
>

I don't think - If you are able to do sort on server side, then you can use
window functions and attach some numeric in correct order.

But the situation is more simple probably - usually you are able to
transform the field for order to number, so you don't need window functions
- the transform function is enough.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Best regards,
> --
> Daniel Vérité
> PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
> Twitter: @DanielVerite
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2015-12-17 19:58:56 Re: psql - -dry-run option
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-12-17 19:52:44 Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql