Re: psql - -dry-run option

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql - -dry-run option
Date: 2015-12-17 19:58:56
Message-ID: CAFNqd5VqroQSvSg2kQS7Lsr=9pNoHwaXtacEVaRXwSiCSuiTfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 December 2015 at 14:16, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> or different idea - just enforce syntax check without execution.

That seems pretty cool... I'd find "syntax check without execution" to be
pretty useful to test SQL (and especially DDL).

--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-17 20:13:21 Re: psql - -dry-run option
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-12-17 19:58:13 Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql