Re: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher
Date: 2017-10-27 11:05:38
Message-ID: CAFj8pRC89WQ275zqP_-BY=mLon0qu3t9uS6Di2ML8T7xAQJMeA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-10-27 13:03 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:

> On 10/27/17 04:06, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Why buildin process has prefix bgworker?
>
> Implementation detail. This has been changed in master already.
>

ok

Thank you

Pavel

>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-10-27 11:31:09 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10 manual breaks links with anchors
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-10-27 11:03:10 Re: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher