Re: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher

From:	Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To:	Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher
Date:	2017-10-27 11:03:10
Message-ID:	2b72c1d3-c19e-9156-fd91-0cb1707aec35@2ndquadrant.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2017-10-27 08:06:29 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>  2017-10-27 11:03:10 from Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>   2017-10-27 11:05:38 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher at 2017-10-27 08:06:29 from Pavel Stehule

Responses

• Re: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher at 2017-10-27 11:05:38 from Pavel Stehule

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Pavel Stehule	2017-10-27 11:05:38	Re: inconsistency in process names - bgworker: logical replication launcher
Previous Message	Jeevan Chalke	2017-10-27 11:01:26	Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping