Re: query performance issue

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Samir Magar <samirmagar8(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: query performance issue
Date: 2017-11-15 13:12:10
Message-ID: CAFj8pRC6xh=HDq1jwxW8n1Ct8=FbbdqHcx_VFHNCdNUz41rTWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2017-11-15 13:54 GMT+01:00 Samir Magar <samirmagar8(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> please find the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> please send EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> 2017-11-15 10:33 GMT+01:00 Samir Magar <samirmagar8(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I am having performance issues with one of the query.
>>> The query is taking 39 min to fetch 3.5 mil records.
>>>
>>> I want to reduce that time to 15 mins.
>>> could you please suggest something to its performance?
>>>
>>> server configuration:
>>> CPUs = 4
>>> memory = 16 GM
>>> shared_buffers = 3 GB
>>> work_mem = 100MB
>>> effective_cache_size = 12 GB
>>>
>>> we are doing the vacuum/analyze regularly on the database.
>>>
>>> attached is the query with its explain plan.
>>>
>>>

There is wrong plan due wrong estimation

for this query you should to penalize nested loop

set enable_nestloop to off;

before evaluation of this query

Thanks,
>>> Samir Magar
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)
>>> org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>>>
>>>
>>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2017-11-15 14:16:21 Re: query performance issue
Previous Message Samir Magar 2017-11-15 12:54:45 Re: query performance issue