From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add new psql help topics, accessible to both --help and \?. |
Date: | 2014-09-10 11:36:56 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC5++DC8ppXTMTvNW=sUhAk1F9T09uBZBLO6Q0BQ7-8fQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
2014-09-10 13:15 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
> wrote:
> > The best plan after that seems to be to add optional_argument support to
> > getopt_long.c - looks easy enough. Do we need a configure test for
> > optional_argument? I don't think so, but I could see somebody arguing
> > the other way round.
> Adding support for optional_argument in src/port would be the best
> solution for long-term purposes. So +1 for it or we'll be limited in
> the future as well. Here is for example attached a proof-of-concept
> patch that it is not that complicated to add support for optional
> arguments... Interestingly, the current implementation dates of 2003
> in 939a59f and has not been majorly touched since. The patch has been
> tested with MSVC.
> --
> Michael
>
super
Pavel
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-09-10 13:49:37 | Re: pgsql: Add new psql help topics, accessible to both --help and \?. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-09-10 11:15:31 | Re: pgsql: Add new psql help topics, accessible to both --help and \?. |