Re: pgsql: Add new psql help topics, accessible to both --help and \?.

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add new psql help topics, accessible to both --help and \?.
Date: 2014-09-10 11:36:56
Message-ID: CAFj8pRC5++DC8ppXTMTvNW=sUhAk1F9T09uBZBLO6Q0BQ7-8fQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

2014-09-10 13:15 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
> wrote:
> > The best plan after that seems to be to add optional_argument support to
> > getopt_long.c - looks easy enough. Do we need a configure test for
> > optional_argument? I don't think so, but I could see somebody arguing
> > the other way round.
> Adding support for optional_argument in src/port would be the best
> solution for long-term purposes. So +1 for it or we'll be limited in
> the future as well. Here is for example attached a proof-of-concept
> patch that it is not that complicated to add support for optional
> arguments... Interestingly, the current implementation dates of 2003
> in 939a59f and has not been majorly touched since. The patch has been
> tested with MSVC.
> --
> Michael
>

super

Pavel

>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-09-10 13:49:37 Re: pgsql: Add new psql help topics, accessible to both --help and \?.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-09-10 11:15:31 Re: pgsql: Add new psql help topics, accessible to both --help and \?.