| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql \sf doesn't show it's SQL when ECHO_HIDDEN is on |
| Date: | 2014-11-21 16:11:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBsnDKiLQnhPbTTW2kLk3NX4nEd=ZwSm0i821p4X0xDjg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-11-21 16:46 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > I noticed the other day that psql doesn't honor ECHO_HIDDEN for \sf.
> > This looks on a somewhat cursory examination to be the only significant
> > place that doesn't. Is there any reason for this, or should I just
> > adjust it so that it uses PSQLexec like pretty much every other slash
> > command?
>
> I think that was just an oversight in that patch. Adjust away.
>
yes, it is open ticket
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-11-21 17:22:38 | Re: psql \sf doesn't show it's SQL when ECHO_HIDDEN is on |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-11-21 16:08:04 | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |