| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql \sf doesn't show it's SQL when ECHO_HIDDEN is on |
| Date: | 2014-11-21 17:22:38 |
| Message-ID: | 546F74DE.1080508@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/21/2014 11:11 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2014-11-21 16:46 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>>:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net <mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>>
> writes:
> > I noticed the other day that psql doesn't honor ECHO_HIDDEN for \sf.
> > This looks on a somewhat cursory examination to be the only
> significant
> > place that doesn't. Is there any reason for this, or should I just
> > adjust it so that it uses PSQLexec like pretty much every other
> slash
> > command?
>
> I think that was just an oversight in that patch. Adjust away.
>
>
> yes, it is open ticket
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRCu3wV0MK4WYFBQDs1vosNmh5tXS2Gb=+fbojnW-1wzQg@mail.gmail.com
>
>
OK. it was so trivial I just did it.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-11-21 17:23:43 | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-11-21 16:11:13 | Re: psql \sf doesn't show it's SQL when ECHO_HIDDEN is on |