Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions (PostgreSQL 11)

po 17. 9. 2018 v 23:15 odesílatel Thomas Munro <
thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> napsal:

> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:36 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > po 17. 9. 2018 v 2:05 odesílatel Thomas Munro <
> thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> napsal:
> >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:26 AM Andrew Dunstan
> >> <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > On 01/24/2018 04:30 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > I am sending updated version.
> >> > >
> >> > > Very much thanks for very precious review
> >> >
> >> > Thomas,
> >> >
> >> > I am unable to replicate the Linux failure seen in the cfbot on my
> >> > Fedora machine. Both when building with libxml2 and without, after
> >> > applying the latest patch the tests pass without error. Can you please
> >> > investigate what's going on here?
> >>
> >> Well this is strange... I can't reproduce the problem either with or
> >> without --with-libxml on a Debian box (was trying to get fairly close
> >> to the OS that Travis runs on). But I see the same failure when I
> >> apply the patch on my FreeBSD 12 laptop and test without
> >> --with-libxml. Note that when cfbot runs it, the patch is applied
> >> with FreeBSD patch, and then it's tested without --with-libxml on
> >> Ubuntu (Travis's default OS). [Side note: I should change it to build
> >> --with-libxml, but that's not the point.] So the common factor is a
> >> different patch implementation. I wonder if a hunk is being
> >> misinterpreted.
> >
> >
> > This patch is not too large. Please, can me send a related files, I can
> check it manually.
>
> I confirmed that xml_1.out is different depending on which 'patch' you
> use. I've attached the output from FreeBSD patch 2.0-12u11 and GNU
> patch 2.5.8. It's an interesting phenomenon, probably due to having a
> huge long file with a lot of repeated text and a slightly different
> algorithms or parameters, but I don't think you need to worry about it
> for this. Sorry for the distraction.
>

ok. Thank you for info

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Thomas Munro
> http://www.enterprisedb.com
>