From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? |
Date: | 2017-10-08 17:04:59 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBVc2XCzPLvLBPNLunLtr68Ny5WwVUYOSJYke+oo_ktKg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-10-08 18:59 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
> On 2017-10-08 18:57:28 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > 2017-10-08 18:44 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2017-10-08 18:36:23 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > > 2. Lot of used tables are pretty wide - 60, 120, .. columns
> > > >
> > > > Now, I am doing profiling, and I see so most time is related to
> > > >
> > > > ExecTypeFromTLInternal(List *targetList, bool hasoid, bool skipjunk)
> > >
> > > Yea, that's known - I've complained about this a couple times. You
> could
> > > try whether the following master branch helps:
> > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/andresfreund/
> > > postgres.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/simple_statement_perf
> > >
> > > That's just micro-optimization though, not a more fundamental
> > > solution. But for me it yields pretty nice speedups for cases with long
> > > tlists.
> > >
> > >
> > it is just this patch
> >
> > HeapTuple tup;
> > Form_pg_type typTup;
> >
> > + if (typid < FirstBootstrapObjectId)
> > + break;
> > +
> > tup = SearchSysCache1(TYPEOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(typid));
> > if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tup))
> > elog(ERROR, "cache lookup failed for type %u", typid);
>
> No.
>
please, how I can clone your repo?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-10-08 17:10:32 | Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-10-08 16:59:19 | Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? |