From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? |
Date: | 2017-10-08 17:10:32 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRB+iHSXaO6YTXntGvbNHoNnFgi5AieEhcb+29XT63HvCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-10-08 19:04 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
> 2017-10-08 18:59 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
>
>> On 2017-10-08 18:57:28 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > 2017-10-08 18:44 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > On 2017-10-08 18:36:23 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > > > 2. Lot of used tables are pretty wide - 60, 120, .. columns
>> > > >
>> > > > Now, I am doing profiling, and I see so most time is related to
>> > > >
>> > > > ExecTypeFromTLInternal(List *targetList, bool hasoid, bool skipjunk)
>> > >
>> > > Yea, that's known - I've complained about this a couple times. You
>> could
>> > > try whether the following master branch helps:
>> > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/andresfreund/
>> > > postgres.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/simple_statement_perf
>> > >
>> > > That's just micro-optimization though, not a more fundamental
>> > > solution. But for me it yields pretty nice speedups for cases with
>> long
>> > > tlists.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > it is just this patch
>> >
>> > HeapTuple tup;
>> > Form_pg_type typTup;
>> >
>> > + if (typid < FirstBootstrapObjectId)
>> > + break;
>> > +
>> > tup = SearchSysCache1(TYPEOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(typid));
>> > if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tup))
>> > elog(ERROR, "cache lookup failed for type %u", typid);
>>
>> No.
>>
>
> please, how I can clone your repo?
>
>
> I found it
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-10-08 17:23:59 | Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-10-08 17:04:59 | Re: is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significant performance issue, maybe bug? |