Re: Function tracking

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rebecca Clarke <r(dot)clarke83(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function tracking
Date: 2013-06-07 10:44:50
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB8phQkX_UZp56xN3-8g2bKKO7XR5p7FN0SLAAhR-+OwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello

2013/6/7 Rebecca Clarke <r(dot)clarke83(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hi all
>
> I'm looking for suggestions on the best way to track the updates to a
> function.
>
> We have two databases, Dev & Live, so I want to update Live with just the
> functions that have been modified in the DEV databas3e.
> Is there another, easier way to track the updates than manually recording it
> in a document? (I'm trying to eliminate human interference).
>

There is a few tools

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4804779/how-to-check-difference-between-two-databases-in-postgressql
http://pgdiff.sourceforge.net/

But I prefer editing files for storing schema and function
definitions. And I use a git. I dislike direct object modifying via
tools like pgAdmin and similar.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Many thanks in advance
>
> Rebecca
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message F Wolff 2013-06-07 10:48:56 Strange ranking with dict_xsyn
Previous Message Rebecca Clarke 2013-06-07 10:30:18 Function tracking