Re: security_definer_search_path GUC

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Date: 2021-06-01 10:55:56
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAzw0VVfX5da3EGjD2BSaC3Sibm0BTZ_qd0ZEL0--XwXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

út 1. 6. 2021 v 12:53 odesílatel Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> napsal:

> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, at 10:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> Operators use schemas too. I cannot imagine any work with operators with
> the necessity of explicit schemas.
>
>
> I thought operators are mostly installed in the public schema, in which
> case that wouldn't be a problem, or am I missing something here?
>

It is inconsistency - if I use schema for almost all, then can be strange
to store operators just to public.

> /Joel
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2021-06-01 11:12:42 Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2021-06-01 10:52:50 Re: security_definer_search_path GUC