Re: security_definer_search_path GUC

From: "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Marko Tiikkaja" <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Date: 2021-06-01 10:52:50
Message-ID: 94bcbbf7-bb25-4838-a875-d09d4e2f6bdd@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, at 10:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Operators use schemas too. I cannot imagine any work with operators with the necessity of explicit schemas.

I thought operators are mostly installed in the public schema, in which case that wouldn't be a problem, or am I missing something here?

/Joel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2021-06-01 10:55:56 Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-06-01 10:09:25 Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication