| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Question about building an exportable snapshop |
| Date: | 2021-10-20 11:41:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-v_sd6EpXpgYyR_5zSwk95=ZgkGyHh6ZRxjDMvJ47C80A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 5:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > While working on the issue [1], I realize that if a subtransaction
> > hasn't done any catalog change then we don't add this in the commit
> > xid list even if we are building a full snapshot [2].
> >
>
> I think this is true only if we have reached SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT
> state otherwise, we are adding subtransactions in the committed xip
> array by setting 'needs_timetravel' to true. And if we have already
> reached a consistent state before it then we anyway don't need to add
> this. If this is true, do you still see any problem?
Yeah, you are right.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-10-20 11:47:02 | Re: pgsql: Document XLOG_INCLUDE_XID a little better |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-10-20 11:36:15 | Re: Question about building an exportable snapshop |