| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
| Date: | 2016-09-29 07:26:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vE2n6YbkEfJ2JRD+4Z8b+Kv6u07PCCVVdC3Sn26F0EFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, definitely - we're missing something important, I think. One difference
> is that Dilip is using longer runs, but I don't think that's a problem (as I
> demonstrated how stable the results are).
>
> I wonder what CPU model is Dilip using - I know it's x86, but not which
> generation it is. I'm using E5-4620 v1 Xeon, perhaps Dilip is using a newer
> model and it makes a difference (although that seems unlikely).
I am using "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 8830 @ 2.13GHz "
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-09-29 07:54:24 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-09-29 07:16:00 | Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion |