From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Date: | 2016-09-29 07:54:24 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K_m1YpzQF8w8pqfLXX8p+o81QEmBbiSxsxj42j-uXV6A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yes, definitely - we're missing something important, I think. One difference
>> is that Dilip is using longer runs, but I don't think that's a problem (as I
>> demonstrated how stable the results are).
>>
>> I wonder what CPU model is Dilip using - I know it's x86, but not which
>> generation it is. I'm using E5-4620 v1 Xeon, perhaps Dilip is using a newer
>> model and it makes a difference (although that seems unlikely).
>
> I am using "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 8830 @ 2.13GHz "
>
Another difference is that m/c on which Dilip is doing tests has 8 sockets.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-29 07:59:55 | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2016-09-29 07:26:00 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |