From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
Date: | 2018-11-05 12:34:56 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uhQ_A-9yiyGWHV9vzt==BRyaErkrNwnUsHB=TjMSMoiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:13 PM Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > It passes make check on Unix and Windows, though currently it's
> > failing some of the TAP tests for reasons I'm looking into (possibly
> > due to bugs in the lower level patches, not sure).
> >
> I looked into the regression failures when the tap-tests are enabled.
> It seems that we're not estimating and allocating the shared memory
> for rollback-hash tables correctly. I've added a patch to fix the
> same.
>
I have included your fix in the latest version of the undo-worker patch[1]
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-11-05 12:46:00 | Re: Code of Conduct plan,Re: Code of Conduct plan,Re: Code of Conduct plan,Re: Code of Conduct plan |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2018-11-05 12:32:06 | Re: Undo worker and transaction rollback |